California ACLU Joins Opposition Against Assembly Bill 831

Written By:   Author Thumbnail Dan Holmes
Author Thumbnail Dan Holmes
Dan launched his first website in the 1990s. He has written more than 4 million words for the internet and print. He previously worked for the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Major League Baseball, and minor l...
Read Full Profile
ACLU joins opposition to California’s AB 831, citing risks to civil liberties in the sweepstakes casino ban bill.

A powerful organization with a long history in American political activism is opposed to a bill that would ban sweepstakes casinos in California.

The American Civil Liberties Union has joined the opposition to a California bill that would prohibit sweepstakes casinos. The ACLU, which boasts a pedigree of fighting for civil liberties, cites concerns over unintended consequences for companies and consumers.

The Social and Promotional Games Association (SPGA) welcomes the company in opposing California Assembly Bill 831, which passed its second committee hearing on Tuesday and is next slated for the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The SPGA argues the “bill’s broad language has created uncertainty around the legality of common sweepstakes and promotional programs.” The organization also criticizes the methods behind the legislation, calling AB 831 a child of a “gut-and-amend” process.

‘Proud to stand alongside the ACLU’

The list of opponents to AB 831 includes:

  • ACLU California Action
  • American Transaction Processors Coalition
  • Association of National Advertisers
  • Californians United for a Responsible Budget
  • Social and Promotional Games Association
  • Social Gaming Leadership Alliance
  • Virtual Gaming World

“The SPGA is proud to stand alongside the ACLU, the Association of National Advertisers, and other partners in voicing concerns about AB 831,” an SPGA spokesperson said in a statement. “This diverse coalition, including civil liberties advocates, leading businesses, and industry groups, reflects a shared belief that the bill, as written, could have unintended consequences for lawful promotional practices without offering clear consumer protections.”

In the statement, the SPGA says the ACLU opposes AB 831 in part because of concerns over “vague definitions that could criminalize standard promotional activities.” In other jurisdictions where sweepstakes casino bans have emerged, opponents have made claims that bans on sweepstakes marketing tactics would eliminate many traditionally accepted advertising practices and harm consumers.

The ACLU has not previously taken a public stance for or against sweeps gaming in any of the states that have dealt with that issue.

About The Author
Dan Holmes
Dan launched his first website in the 1990s. He has written more than 4 million words for the internet and print. He previously worked for the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Major League Baseball, and minor league baseball as a producer and writer. Dan is skilled at covering sports, sports business, sports betting, and other topics. He is the author of three books on sports. He’s ghost-written sports biographies, and covered live events such as the MLB All-Star Game, MLB postseason, and spring training. His writing has appeared in The Athletic, Sporting News, Detroit Free Press, The Oklahoman, and Wall Street Journal. He has nearly a decade of experience covering the gaming industry in the United States.